Microsoft XBE: No We Say!

One of my friends gave me a video on my USB stick, and I popped it in my (now returned and repaired) XBox 360 to have a look at it. It was a Monday night and a warning message popped up telling me that in order to watch it I had to download an update.

I was aware of a massive new XBox Live update that night, and I thought I might as well go along with it so that I could watch the video. This is the update that allows you to copy games onto your hard disk.

I regretted it later obviously, when I had to watch an awful pseudo-artsy video of… something. I’m not entirely clear what it was trying to convey but it was pretentious. Here’s a youtube link. Whatever, I ignored my instincts and pressed on. Until I got to the “Choose an Avatar” screen.

No thanks. They all looked awful, cutesy and anorexic. I pressed the “B” button to go past it.

Are you sure you don’t want to select an avatar?”

Yes, quite sure thanks, I want to watch my video.

Then I was taken to the new interface. Not only is the bottom two fifths of my background taken up with a horrible lime green… what is it supposed to be anyway? But in order to look at a friend on my list I have to scroll through every single friend I have. Wonderful. Microsoft have tried to take two aspects of their competitors’ work and have mashed them together and the effect is horrible. The whole interface is difficult, unintuitive, ugly, and just plain unnecessary. And the worst part is that it’s mandatory.

But at least I don’t have to choose an avatar, right?

Wrong! Last week Microsoft made it impossible to sign into XBox Live without selecting an avatar. Why?

Why do I need to have selected a cutesy and stupid looking avatar in order to play games online?

Why can I not select the interface that I preferred?

Why is this new attempt to appeal to younger players being forced on the older ones without them having a choice?

Who made this decision, and who thought that it was a good idea to force it on gamers who don’t want it?

- John

It’s just plain wrong.

Posted in John | 1 Comment

Why COD5 servers are dwarfed by Call of Duty 4 servers

Just Google, and you’ll see COD5 outsold Call of Duty 4, 2:1 in the first few weeks. That’s one hell of a headstart on gamers looking for COD5 servers. So why, when you search for UK game servers, are there just over 1800 Call of Duty 4 servers online (nearly 5,000 playing as I write this), and in comparison just over 700 COD5 servers, and half the amount of players online right now?

Also considering Call of Duty 4 gameservers have dropped off recently (as Call of Duty 5 WAW was released!) What does that tell you about COD5 servers? Or the lack of!

Please sir, let us run COD5 servers

It might suggest that some gaming clans wanting to run COD5 servers can’t, because it’s only available on Windows right now. A kind member on the linux COD mailing list recently published a tutorial on running COD5 on Linux, using a program called Wine. That’s great, but two problems with running servers through Wine:

  • It’s not the most stable of solutions
  • It increases CPU usage drastically

It’s not the answer. More worryingly, was after what was published – COD5 linux servers would be available, why are they not, over a month since the release of the game?

The problem is, no-one really knows. No-one knows when COD5 servers will be available to run on Linux. No-one knows whether it might be the 1.1 and upcoming 1.2 patches that are causing the delay. No-one knows!

We’ve ended up setting up a Windows platform to run Call of Duty 5 servers on. We didn’t want to, like the many clans and communities.

It just seems odd, because surely financially, more COD5 servers = more games sold. More money for the developers and publishers.

The server stats speak for themselves. I wonder if the developers will listen to the community for the release of Call of Duty 6? I don’t hold up much hope.

Posted in Call of Duty 5 | 1 Comment

Is your server host telling porkies?

We all tell a little white lie every so often.

No… your bum, doesn’t look big in that extra extra large swim suit.…..
I’ve only had three pints…
Moi, eat the rest of your pizza? How very dare you.

There’s the odd white lie, and there’s blatant lies. Unfortunately when it comes to stretching the truth, some internet businesses are no different, and neither are some server hosts. Whether it’s a Call of Duty 4, Team Fortress 2, or Counterstrike server host you are looking for, here’s three common porkies to beware of when choosing the next host for your clan’s gameserver:

  • Do they really offer the 24/7 support advertised?
  • Are they really hosting gameservers from their own datacentre?
  • When they talk about we is it we, or me?

The great 24/7 support server host lie

Sometimes I feel like a stuck record going on about this one. I probably am.  But it does erk me those one-man server hosts (see below) claiming 24/7 support. If your bank claimed to be open 24/7, and it wasn’t, you’d call your local outsourced call centre and give them a jolly good piece of your mind.

So it shocks me, frequently those server hosts that use the whole 24/7 support thing as the main selling point. Telephone numbers that always go through to answer machine. Emails and support tickets unanswered for days. If only gameservers weren’t so important, and out lifeline! In fact, I had a shock the other day. My own public Call of Duty 4 server went down. I was shaking with fear. I nearly had to go out. Can you believe it? Luckily I was able to phone myself, and got the server rebooted.

But what if you’ve already bought a gameserver from a server host that claims 24/7 support when they don’t? Would it be acceptable for the server to go down at 6pm on a Friday night, and your server host doesn’t respond until Tuesday?

Some server hosts think the fact a website is potentially online 24/7, and that you can fill out an online contact form at 4am, means they offer 24/7. Don’t fall for it. They might think it means support 24/7 . It doesn’t.

My gameserver host has their own datacentre

This comes a close second on the lie scoreboard to the 24/7 myth.

There’s nothing wrong with not owning a datacentre. Let’s face it, if you are in the know you’ll understand already a minimum datacentre budget is going to cost you upwards of half a million to kit out. So it’s not really practical budget wise, for gameserver hosting.

But what is a concern is those hosts, that copy and paste data centre specs from their dedicated server host, and conveniently pass it off as their own.

Beware. Not knowing you do get found out for this, says a lot about this kind of server host.

Server hosting, to we or not to we

That is the question. There’s nothing wrong with a one man company. I’m sure you wouldn’t tip your window cleaner off his ladder, because the window washing waster doesn’t have 30 employees. Well you might if you are a tad sadistic, or he’s not cleaning the windows very well (my window cleaner, beware). The same logic applies to a game server. There’s lots of single man (or girl) server hosts working 8-10 hours a day, and providing excellent service.

But what if the me suddenly becomes a we. The server host that tells you you need to contact support, but it’s actually the same person. The clan server host that claims he has 3 support staff….but he’s actually paying them with a COD 4 server and a bag of nuts.

Being liberal with the truth, stretching the truth, or outright lying?

All my personal opinion, but a hopefully a few pointers to keep you informed all the same ;)

Until tomorrow :)

Posted in Random thoughts | 3 Comments

Why affordable gameservers are usually better

You wouldn’t know there is a credit crunch on. Houses being repossessed. People out of work, unable to go to the pub, or eat out at their favourite restaurant. People staying in with cheap bottles of vodka, and turning to old games. The economy collapsing before us.

So why are gameserver providers getting cheaper?

Well at least, you wouldn’t know if you were a gameserver host. Ever day I witness an ongoing challenge to host gameservers cheaper, and ‘better’. Claims of more affordable. Affordable to the person renting the clan server, perhaps. Affordable to the provider hosting the server?

It really hit me just now, when someone on MSN Messenger just claimed we were expensive because he could get a 32 slot Call of Duty 4 gameserver for £23.  BTW, that’s £23 for 12 months. Blimey. Ok, so there’s cheap, and there’s…..suicidal. Some people are thick.

I don’t think so. A few facts to consider:

  • Power and rack prices have increased up to 6x what they were 4 years ago.
  • So gameservers are far more costly to host on dedicated servers.
  • Game server customers expect more, and rightly so.
  • Granted server hardware is more powerful, but that doesn’t cancel out the huge cost increases.

‘Affordable’ versus ‘Cheap’ clanservers, the myth uncovered!

So you might ask, why do gameserver hosts price themselves so cheap? What do you call affordable game servers.  And I won’t try and claim this applies to every host. Economies of scale means larger hosts can push out gameservers at a cheap price, because their overheads are lower.

But the kiddie host with the one old colocated server, pushing the old 50p a slot. Do me a favour. It does not add up. So back to the point, why are these clanserver hosts doing it so cheap? And is it affordable?

In a nutshell, no.

Such gameserver hosts are very often:

  • Running at a loss, because it’s only £20-£30 to lose each month
  • License fees, what license fees? Are you sure your Ventrilo / Teamspeak 2 server is authorised. I’m sure you wouldn’t want it going offline halfway through a war ;)
  • Not offering the 24/7 support they claim. Do you think someone doesn’t sleep to lose money? I’d have them commited if they were.
  • Unable to compete with the big players. They cannot beat their level of support, uptime, and promises. There’s nothing unique in what they offer. They are just another one of many gameserver hosts. So what’s the *only* thing they can do? You guessed it, price. They make themselves Cheaper. And most definitely they’ll be the cheapest gameserver host on the internet. Yeah, right

So why are affordable gameservers better?

With total reference to the above, any gameserver host worth its salt will not be looking at whether they can pay their hosting bills at the end of the month. They will be looking at the next 12 months, and beyond that.

I would like to think an honest, and affordable gameserver provider will not pluck prices from the sky, in order to compete on the only thing they can do- being cheap.

Clanserver providers that price themselves as affordable, are thinking about keeping in business, and won’t be running away with your rental fees.

To the boys, you remember what you were told about cheap girls? Well gameservers aren’t any different.

And finally, remember. If it looks too good to be true. It probably is.

Posted in Random thoughts | 4 Comments

Zombie Panic Source update 06/12

Another update has arrived over night:

A required update for Left 4 Dead has been released.  Please run hldsupdatetool to receive it.  The specific changes include:

- Fixed Infected Players melee pushing large objects to block the survivors path
- Fixed +lobby exploit
- Fixed exploit of “hugging” the Witch from behind where she can’t hit you
- Fixed players not being kicked from a vote by changing their name before it succeeds
- Disabled difficulty change votes from the console in versus mode

Jason

Please reboot your Zombie Panic Source server to implement these changes.

Posted in Left 4 Dead | Leave a comment

L4D update – 05/12/2008

An update has been released for Left 4 Dead gameservers:

A required update for Left 4 Dead is now available.  Please run hldsupdatetool to receive this update.  The specific changes include:

- Finding a dedicated server when starting the game from a lobby is now faster and more reliable
- Versus mode is now locked to Normal difficulty
- Difficulty on a server is now locked to the one set by the lobby reservation
- Fixed lagouts/spikes after level transition
- Fixed directory issue with spray logs in some cases
- Fixed video settings not saving after closing video options dialog
- Corrected a boomer suicide exploit
- Several minor localization fixes
- Fixed a error were disabling cheats would incorrectly reset data

Jason

Posted in Left 4 Dead | Leave a comment

Zombie Panic Source Update (1.4.1)

Hi guys,

An update has been released for Zombie Panic Source game servers, detailed below:

=====1.4.1 (12-1-2008) =======
-Autovision and noscoot cvars should now save settings.
-Zombies can now lunge “through” knockback.
-Bullet knockback has been significantly reduced. (Slowdown on bullet hits only apply now).
-If a carrier disconnects, a new carrier will be chosen.
-sv_usescustom cvar now added for people who use custom plugins. This will help differentiate standard gameplay servers from ones with gameplay modifications.
-Fixes for various ladder bugs.
-Fixes for various maps.
-Flashlight will now flicker out after extended use, but will recharge at the same rate. Use it sparingly.
-Some minor sound tweaks.
-Infections have mutated, and no longer take an exact amount of time to fully turn a human.
-Zombies can no longer walk. Also walk is now disabled during panic.
-Stamina meter now indicates whether or not you are walking.
-Toggle keys no longer stall out respawning.
-Hitting the lunge key without taking any action should now have very little effect on your feed-o-meter.
-Collision system is now a bit smoother.
-Tweaked M4 recoil, and M4/Shotgun damage levels.
-Bug where dryfire would repeat if you started to shoot a rifle while reloading is fixed.
-You can no longer drop ammo while you are trying to reload a gun.
-A few helpful messages will show up if you are trying to do something that an in-game timer prevents you from doing too often.
-Alt firing while underwater with certain guns no longer plays a dryfire sound.
-Backwards bunnyhopping is no longer possible.
-Fixed a bug that prevented footstep sounds from playing when you are extremely weighed down.
-Removed some meaningless console errors.

To run the update, either run the Update button on the INX control panel, or simply reboot the server.

Posted in Zombie Panic Source | Leave a comment

Left for Dead released

It’s here :)

Early this morning after terrabytes of pre-loading world wide, Left 4 Dead was released to the public.

Unfortunately myself, I purchased the game before the demo….yet Steam wants me to buy it again for some reason. So I’ll have to wait for now :(

We’ve uploaded all content, and as an existing customer you can switch and install to Left 4 Dead. Left 4 Dead servers are now also available for the full the game on our website at very low slot pricing.

Let’s hope the full game is as successful as the demo was.

Posted in Left 4 Dead | Leave a comment

Left 4 Dead update

The Left 4 Dead Demo has been updated.  Please run hldsupdatetool to receive this update.  The specific changes include:

- Fixed problem with users not being able to connect to dedicated servers
- Fix a bug with the group browser not always showing the list of group servers
- Fixed a bug with the rcon command

This is not a required update, but it is recommended that you update as soon as possible.

Jason

And another one…

A required update for the Left 4 Dead Demo has been released.  Please run hldsupdatetool to receive the update.  The specific changes include:

- Fixed a bug where the connection to a server would get stuck in a looping state
- Made sv_steamgroup_exclusive not connect to matchmaking. Removed sv_unreserve, private servers should sv_steamgroup_exclusive now
- Improved the speed in finding a game lobby
- Fixed a bug that could cause you to search for a game lobby indefinitely

Jason

As above, an updates has been released for Left 4 Dead game servers.

To apply the update, please simply reboot your game server.

Posted in Left 4 Dead | Leave a comment

Saints Row 2 (and a pinch of Grand Theft Auto IV)

You know how it is.

Every time I play a game to completion I think “Man I can’t wait to review that for INX! But first I’ll have a nap because I’ve got work in 3 hours.” Then by the time I get back from work, tired and hungry, I go to bed to catch up on lost sleep. Then I never actually get round to writing the blog, because there are more games to be played.

So that’s why I haven’t completed Saints Row 2 before writing a review on it. But I’ve played it for just under ten hours and I’m going to play it for plenty more than that so here it is: Saints Row 2 is not a Grand Theft Auto clone. What it is is a vastly superior spiritual successor of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City.

While Grand Theft Auto IV is dark, gritty, and eerily serious in places Saints Row 2 is light-hearted and fun throughout (the exception being when your friend Karlos was killed by a rival gang and he died shaking your hand, in a strangely stark moment which effectively gives your character motivation). My avatar can’t even be bothered to shave every morning, or lose weight (or his cockney accent – you get to choose one of three voices per gender) but he finally has motivation to steal nuclear waste to have tattooed into a rival mobster’s face. I didn’t make that up. That actually happens.

Saints Row 2 doesn’t wait. You start by breaking out of prison, thankfully being allowed to skip the tutorial GeOW style, and continue escaping until you reach the mainland to find that your old gang, the Third Street Saints, have been wiped out by rival gangs. Old characters soon return, and the player can proceed with the storyline(s) or play around with the diversions, new ones of which include Fuzz (dress up as a policeman and get medieval on crime for the cameras), and car surfing (literally, jump on a car and try to keep your balance).

A lot of people were put off by just how broken the original Saints Row was in places, not that it actually spoiled your enjoyment of the game, but gamers are demanding and spoiled on the whole, and if you release a buggy game you will suffer. Volition clearly learned this and the results are easy to see: after nearly ten hours of play I’ve only seen one civilian “pop” out of existence when I turned my back on him. Cars no longer stream out when you’re feet away from them and, while the AI still leads to some strange behaviours from the police especially, it on the whole manages its job well enough.

Thanks to an absent, RRODded XBox 360 I played this particular gem on my PlayStation 3, so I don’t know about the achievements. But it doesn’t matter, Saints Row 2 rocks on anything.

- John

john AT inx-gaming.co DOT uk

Posted in Game Reviews, John | Leave a comment